Art education began in Baltimore County as
early as 1906 when lessons in Handwork and Drawing appeared
in a document called, “Course of Study – Suggestions,
Grades One to Four.”
This “primary manual training” listed a sequence
of lessons and described constructive work as a natural form
of expression, correlated with Nature, History, Literature
and Art. Drawing was included in outlined lessons, with related
subject matter to develop “visual as well as aesthetic
powers” through illustrative and objective drawing,
design and picture study. Classroom teachers without specific
art training presented these lessons.
An outlined course of study published in
1909 presented lessons in drawing for Grades One to Eight.
The time devoted to drawing was one hour a week. The subject
matter included seasonal coloring of plants and landscapes,
illustrative work from history and literature, the decoration
of such articles as the children had occasion to make during
the year, and a study of the great masterpieces.
“Handwork activities, Grades One to Four,”
and “Manual Training, Grades Six to Eight,”
were intended to be self-activities, and outlined as procedural
steps. Classroom teachers taught these outlined courses under
supervision.
In 1915 the course of study for the Baltimore
County Schools was established with the aim to aid in the “expression
of energy in terms of beauty.” Outlines following each
month’s general subject matter were made for Grades
One to Eight – “directed lessons to be followed
by an undirected seat exercise.”
The “Drawing for Grades One to Four,”
and the “Fine Arts for the Grammar Grades”
established a forward-looking philosophy of functional cultural
values, developed with criticism and suggestions by Miss
Olivia Keech, supervisor of Drawing in the Baltimore City
Schools. Miss Keech also conducted meetings in which she
outlined work for the teachers.
During the following years art education progressed according
to the initiative and training of individual classroom teachers.
The work in the elementary schools gradually came closer
to the subject matter; teacher initiated activities pointed
toward pupil-initiated activities; and stereotyped outlines
were replaced by class projects.
In 1938, three specialist art teachers were
placed in the high schools with a program in which two-thirds
of the time were devoted to correlated art activities and
one-third to elective art activities. Three more teachers
were added in 1939, and a supervisor of art for elementary
and high schools was appointed. The work was outlined to
encourage creative units of study.
The role of the art teacher was to assist
the classroom teacher as a resource person, and, in this
capacity, met with each class for approximately one period
every month. From 1952-1954, the Maryland State Department
of Education conducted workshops to prepare a guide for art
education that would help schools systems throughout the
state in teacher training and curriculum development. Participant
groups included elementary and high school classroom teachers,
art teachers, general content supervisors, college instructors,
and members of the State Department of Education. In 1954
the bulletin, “Art in Our Maryland,” was published.
In 1957 a second art supervisor to specialize in the elementary
schools was appointed.
Seventh, eighth, and ninth grade programs were revised.
Curriculum bulletins were developed for high school advanced
Fine Art and Commercial Art courses. Two experimental elective
seminar programs were designed to reach more high school
students. One seminar course focused on consumer, cultural,
and leisure needs; the other focused on art history and
cultural understandings. In the mid to late 1960’s,
recognizing a need for a more articulated program from
elementary to high school, more formal, sequenced curricula
were developed for K-12 art education: Art for Children,
1960 and Art: Grade 9, 1969.
Elementary art helping teacher positions were created
to work with other elementary art teachers. To encourage
the use of the museum as a resource and support a developing
art program-museum relationship, a museum liaison position
was proposed in 1965-66 to conduct school tours to museums.
By 1964, 130 art teachers staffed schools throughout the
county.
(1906-1960’s Source: From a report by James B. Laubheimer,
coordinator of art from 1965-1982, to the Baltimore County
Public Schools Board of Education on the eve of his service,
January 1965).
National interest in providing services to students who
displayed high ability prompted the development of Baltimore
County’s Gifted and Talented (GT) program. A Gifted
and Talented Art resource teacher was appointed to work
with art teachers to establish a GT art program and develop
and facilitate an identification process. The primary role
of the GT art resource teacher was to help art teachers
address the needs of highly able art students.
Curricula for all programs continued to be developed annually
by art teachers in summer curriculum workshops. Focus on
Learning: An Approach to Teaching Art, written in1971 was
a definitive teacher resource for elementary through high
school.
Central office staff providing support to the art program
increased. By the mid-1980’s, five elementary instructional
specialists were appointed for each of the five Baltimore
County geographic areas. The instructional specialist position
was part teacher, part resource teacher to the growing
number of elementary art teachers. In addition to these
school-based instructional specialists, the Office of Art
was staffed by a museum liaison teacher, a GT art resource
teacher, two art supervisors, and coordinator of art.
Nationally, discipline-based art education became a strong
force in shifting the focus of art education from primarily
a studio-based emphasis to studio experiences grounded
in art history, culture, and art criticism. In Maryland,
four main goals were identified and were adopted as the
art program goals for Baltimore County:
Perceiving and Responding: The student
will demonstrate the ability to perceive, interpret,
and respond to ideas, experiences, and the environment
through visual art.
Historical, Cultural and Social Context:
The student will demonstrate an understanding of visual
art as a basic aspect of history and human experience.
Creative Expression and Production:
The student will demonstrate the ability to organize
knowledge and ideas for expression in the production
of art.
Aesthetic Criticism: The student will
demonstrate the ability to identify, analyze, and apply
criteria for making visual aesthetic judgments.
The Maryland State Board of Education added fine arts
as a graduation requirement in 1988. Two high school courses,
matched to the 4 art program goals, were designed to serve
as the graduation requirement for visual arts: Art Seminar,
Fundamentals of Art.
Curricula continued to be developed annually by art teachers
in summer curriculum workshops and included new media:
photography.
The museum liaison teacher’s role changed from giving
tours to coordinating the scheduling of multiple museum
field trips. The museum liaison worked with museum personnel
and art teachers to use the museum as an extension of the
art program, developing ten educational partnerships that
included The Baltimore Museum of Art, the Walters Art Gallery,
the Maryland Historical Society, and the Contemporarymuseum.
Slide resources of selected museum collections were developed
to support and align with the Baltimore County art curriculum.
These were developed by teachers and museum personnel under
the leadership of the museum liaison teacher.
1986 was the inaugural year of two exhibits that continue
today: “Art is for Everyone”
at The Baltimore Museum of Art and the “High School
Art Exhibition” at Goucher College. In addition,
five area exhibits and a countywide GT exhibit were mounted
each year, facilitated respectively by the area instructional
specialists and the GT art resource teacher. Services for
GT art students were expanded to include day-long workshops
at schools and universities. In 1988, the Maryland State
Department of Education provided grant funding to establish
a Summer Art Enrichment program for students with high
interests in visual arts. This two-week program continues
to be offered every summer.
Funding for additional resources came from
the Baltimore County Government Arts and Sciences Commission.
With these funds, the Office of Art was able to provide an
Artist-in-Residence program for selected high schools. Two
to three high schools were identified annually to participate
in the program; selection was based on identified needs of
the schools’ art programs. Schools interested in conducting
their own artist residencies were encouraged to submit grant
applications to the Maryland Arts Council
Budgetary constraints reduced central office support for
the art program to three staff members: a coordinator,
supervisor and specialist. Despite the reduction, new programs
were developed. Two magnet high schools and five magnet
middle schools that offered visual arts magnet programs
were opened. In addition, a visual arts career completer
program, Art Intermedia- Digital Arts, was established
in three high schools. This program introduced computer
technology as a new tool for art students with the goal
of preparing students with workplace skills as well as
continuing education beyond high school.
An interdisciplinary primary program, Developing Language
and Literacy Through the Arts (DLLA), was jointly developed
in 1991 with Baltimore County personnel and staff from
The Baltimore Museum of Art. This program, facilitated
by the art specialist, focused on improving the language
skills of language delayed children in Title I schools.
In 1996, the specialist position was replaced by an elementary
art resource position, shared by two part-time art teachers.
One resource teacher was responsible for the Developing
Language and Literacy Through the Arts program and worked
with Title I classroom and art teachers in the implementation
of the program. The other art resource teacher monitored
and worked with the new Prekindergarten Enrichment program
also offered in Title I schools.
Recognition of student achievement increased as numbers
of students received scholarships in national and state
level competitions during this decade. Baltimore County
students were recognized for outstanding achievement in
several prestigious arts competitions: Arts Recognition
and Talent Search, Presidential Scholar in the Arts, Scholastic
Arts Scholarships, Maryland Distinguished Scholar, Maryland
Artist Equity Foundation, Marie Walsh Sharpe. High student
achievement continued as scholarship awards became more
competitive.
National Standards for the Arts were developed in 1994.
State Education Superintendent Nancy Grasmick appointed
a Fine Arts Task Force to begin alignment of Maryland’s
fine arts curricular frameworks to the National Standards
for the Arts. Baltimore County art teachers along with
teachers in other counties were involved in the alignment
of the frameworks. Countywide curriculum workshops were
conducted to begin revising art curricula. In 1995, discussions
of arts assessments for Maryland students began. Several
Maryland arts educators and arts educators in other states
were involved in the preliminary development of arts assessments
for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
which were administered in 1997. The NAEP, also known as "the
Nation's Report Card,"
is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment
of what America's students know and can do in various subject
areas. Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically
in reading, mathematics, science, writing, U.S. history,
civics, geography, and the arts.
The development of National Standards for the Arts and
the alignment of Maryland’s curricular frameworks
prompted renewed attention to the arts. A series of projects
partnered the Maryland Art Education Association with the
Maryland State Department of Education and all school systems
in Maryland. Begun in 1998 and endorsed by Mrs. Frances
Glendening, then First Lady of Maryland, arts education
and student achievement became a statewide focus through
a number of activities sponsored by her office: Youth Art
Month in Annapolis, a statewide exhibit of student art
at the Statehouse in Annapolis; the Holiday Ornament project,
student-designed and constructed ornaments displayed on
Government House holiday trees; Art and Writing project,
publications of student art and literary works. Baltimore
County teachers and students contributed to this effort,
consistently presenting work in all venues.
Partnerships with museums continued; new partnerships with the community
were established; business partners included The Baltimore Life Companies,
Whiteford, Taylor, and Preston LLP, and Coca Cola Enterprises Company.
These business partners provided scholarship awards and opportunities
for students to exhibit work in professional gallery settings.
Funding to add digital technology
to the photography program became available
in the late 1990’s. All high schools
were equipped with upgraded darkroom equipment,
computers, scanners, printers, and software.
The late 1990’s changed
the Artist-in-Residence program from an annual
event to a more focused, ongoing program.
It was redesigned to provide professional
development to teachers while building a
community of artist/teachers working collaboratively
with the resident artist, and whose activities
were directly linked to program goals. A
cadre of teachers in participating schools
trained with the artist during the summer
preceding the residency to engage in art-making
and discuss instructional strategies. During
the school year, the teachers and artist
collaboratively set goals for implementation.
During the first year of residency in each
school the artist made frequent visits to
schools to work with students and model instructional
strategies; teachers followed-up with students
after each visit. In succeeding years, teachers
continued what was learned in the first year
and attended meetings to share progress.
For schools interested in conducting their
own, shorter term artist residencies, applications
for grant funds continued to be available
through the Maryland State Arts Council.
Curriculum alignment became a statewide
focus. The Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE)
provided grant funds to support and accelerate the work of
aligning fine arts curricula and enhance existing programs
across the state. Each school system developed a fine arts
strategic plan which directed program development. In Baltimore
County, funds also supported professional development activities
and the purchase of equipment and other resources to support
arts programs.
Co-curricular activities for the Art Program
continued at both the state and local levels with community
partnerships, exhibits, scholarship competitions, and art
contests. Exhibit opportunities continued to expand at the
state level with new exhibits established at the Louis Goldstein
Treasury Building in Annapolis and new gallery spaces at
the Maryland State Department of Education. Annual exhibits
continued to reflect greater numbers of student participation.
Student achievement continued to grow. Performance data
on the Advanced Placement Studio Art portfolio showed consistent
scores above the national average; student participation
in scholarship competitions increased and resulted in numerous
awards presented to students both nationally and statewide.
A Voluntary State Curriculum for Visual
Arts was developed during the 2003-04 school year. Baltimore
County art teachers participated in writing the curriculum
which provides the foundation of visual arts curricula for
the state. All visual arts curricula continue to be updated
and aligned with the Maryland State Standards for Visual
Arts and discussion of arts assessments continue.
Partnerships with museums continue as have
partnerships with the community. The Mid-Atlantic Bottling
Company became a corporate sponsor for the Eighteenth and
Nineteenth Annual High School Art Exhibition at Goucher College,
providing funds for professional development, scholarships,
and other financial support for the high school program.
Countywide exhibits continued at the Walters Art Museum,
The Baltimore Museum of Art, the Community College of Baltimore
County–Dundalk, the Greenwood Administration building,
and the ESS building on the Greenwood campus.
The artist-in-residence program has continued
and is expanding. Monthly meetings with the artist have been
enthusiastically received and have proven to be a very strong
professional development activity. All current and past teachers
of participating schools meet, bring student work to share,
and discuss progress and process.
The Summer Art Enrichment program continues to be offered
for two weeks in July.