 |
Observations |
|
|
Pros |
Cons |
-
view as they are occurring
-
can be efficient in getting much range and depth in a short time frame
-
allows one to see directly what people are doing without relying on their word
-
firsthand experience
-
can provide objective measurement
-
can determine what does NOT occur
-
observer may see things others do not
-
can be used with participants with weak verbal skills
-
good for description
|
-
can be difficult to interpret or verbalize seen behaviors
-
can be complex to categorize observations
-
can influence behaviors of program participants
-
can be expensive
-
reasons for behavior may be unclear
-
participants may behave in atypical ways when being observed
-
sampling may be limited
-
cannot observe large or dispersed populations
-
some settings can not be observed
-
more expensive than questionnaires/surveys
-
data analysis can be time consuming
-
more objective than surveys because they do not rely on self-reporting (but only as far as observers objectivity)
-
may have observer bias
-
researchers who are participants may alter behavior of subjects
|
|
| Guides |
Observations used to gather accurate information and record behavioral patterns in a systematic way.
Types of Observations:
-
Structured or unstructured
- Structured
- Researchers specifies in detail what is to be observed and how measurements are to be recorded
- Appropriate when problem is clearly defined
- Information needed is specified
- Unstructured
- Researcher monitors all aspects that may seem relevant
- Appropriate when problem has yet to be formulated
- Flexibility is needed in observation to identify key components of the problem and to develop hypotheses
- Potential for bias is high
- Findings should be treated as hypothesis to be tested rather than conclusive finding
-
Disguised or undisguised
- Respondents are unaware that they are being observed
- Respondents behave naturally
- Observation is achieved by hiding or hidden equipment
- Undisguised
- Respondents are aware that they are being observed
- Respondents could behave differently because they are being observe
- Natural or contrived
- Natural
- Observed in its natural settings
- Observed as it takes place
- Ex: observing patrons at a fast food restaurant
- Contrived
- Observed in artificial environment
- Ex: a taste test session
- Personal or mechanical
- Observes actual behavior as it occurs
- Observer may or may not attempt to control
- Observer merely records what is taking place
- Cannot capture everything from note taking
- Mechanical
- Some sort of media used to record observation
- May or may not require respondent’s direct participation
- Continuously recording on-going behavior
- Cannot capture everything from recording
- Participant or non-participant
- Participant
- Researcher becomes part of situation being observed
- Has its roots in ethnographic study
- Very extensive literature
- Different way of classifying role: researcher as employee; researcher as an explicit role; interrupted involvement; observation alone
- May gain more understanding by participating
- May alter events by participating
- Non-participant
- Observer does not interact with participants
- Does not question or communicate
Observations
-
to increase validity, use narrow, specific definitions of behavior to be observed
-
measure low-inference variables (ex: counting the number of times that specific actions occur during a game instead of rating each individual’s sports performance from poor to excellent)
- only record as many aspects of behavior that observers can attend to
|

|
Good websites to gain more insight:
|
 |
|
 |
|