|
|
Teacher name: Student Name ___________________ |
| CATEGORY | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Understanding of Topic | The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly. | The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease. | The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease. | The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic. |
| Use of Facts/Statistics | Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. | Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. | Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. | Every point was not supported. |
| Rebuttal | All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. | Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. | Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. | Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant |
| Respect for Other Team | All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. | Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. | Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. | Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful. |
| Date Created: 2003-07-11 |
Copyright. © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 ALTec, the University of Kansas |