Class Debate: Environmental Science

Teacher name:

Student Name ___________________

CATEGORY 4 3 2 1
Understanding of Topic The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly. The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease. The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease. The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Use of Facts/Statistics Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples. Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. Every point was not supported.
Rebuttal All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong. Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak. Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant
Respect for Other Team All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and were in appropriate language. Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not. Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark. Statements, responses and/or body language were consistently not respectful.


Date Created: 2003-07-11

Copyright. © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 ALTec, the University of Kansas